The Linux community can always be a better place. I have always pictured the “perfect” Linux community as one that is helpful and kind to others, nonexclusive, professional (not in the sense of business formality) and free of bureaucracy. As picturesque as that is, I have doubts to whether that will ever happen. Too many people have attitudes that limit the community. I cannot recount how many people have told me they want to use Linux but don’t want to get around the online community. In this series of blog posts, I plan on addressing several sticking points that are not helping the Linux community, basically a subject per part. We’re close, but we’re not there yet.
The Activism Needs to End
Anyone remember the failed “BadVista” campaign the FSF ran a few years ago? Remember the protests in the hazmat suits? How about the protesters against the OOXML document format? Or even the student who ran across a stage behind Bill Gates with a sign that said “FLOSS” on it? Ever feel a little… embarassed? I’m not saying that the people protesting are not fighting the good fight, because they are, just not in the best way.
Thankfully, the FSF seems to be changing it’s tune. It’s turning to actually creating better products than the competition, rather than having a fit because the competition has a lock on the market. The truth is that there are better ways to approach software injustice… and step one is to not blow it out of proportion. It’s just a piece of software — remember that.
Protesting, of course, is not the only form of activism. There’s also the issue of what is said online. Of course, I could make a 1000 volume book on the junk that happens online. People say a lot of stupid things — mainly because they feel free from the consequences that could be faced in the real world. It’s a shame, it’s a freak show, it’s the online community… not much that can be done there. However, there are a few things that can make things better for everyone. First, attack blogs need to go.
When I think of an attack blog, the first one that comes to mind is “Boycott Novell.” Just a few minutes on the site makes me nautious. So many self-pointing links, angry rants (and pointless rants?… irrational rants?), and images disparaging Microsoft, it leaves me almost embarassed to say I know of anything about Linux. It’s not that the site fights for a competitor, it’s on our side. The site just goes about it in the wrong way – primarily by demonizing a company, and even more specifically demonizing individuals. That’s not good. It makes us look bad and very unprofessional. I mean professional in the sense that we can stand competition, we face it with our own offerings, and we do not stoop to such low levels as attacking individuals. Remember, it’s just a piece of software!
So, instead of activism, we should keep focusing on what we do best: software! If we stick to that, how can we go wrong? If we fall behind, it may not be because of the software, but if it really is better than the competition, people will use it. Remember that the business world is a dirty place, and sometimes someone will sleaze by with a plan that will hold us back. Help somebody on the forums, IRC, or mailing lists. A little kindness goes a long way — a lot further than any sleazy business plan because you end up with another happy user using your software, a user earned by hard work, not just paying someone off. It is also important respect the competition, because that will give us a good reputation with end users, and possibly make things easier when working with the competition.
I’ll follow up soon with Part II. I’m not exactly sure what topic I will hit at just yet, but the Linux community has given me a lot to work with.
Filed under: Uncategorized
Jon,
You make an important point.
You do not win a sale by disparaging the competition.You win by providing your solution and then, by way of example,showing that it can be better than the competition in some cases
This is especially true in the field of education. It is the kiss of death to say either “Linux,” “open source,” or “free software” to an educator or librarian. The technical folks are too dependent on their Windows expertise, the non-technical folks only know Windows.
So you have to sell Linux on its merits.
It that’s not enough, then you need to find a new job.
thanks,dave
No, you’re wrong.
First: We aren’t just unjustly criticizing proprietary products, we’re just pointing out their real weaknesses and downsides. Truth shall make you free.
Then, Linux isn’t only being promoted by a company or corporation with a limited budget and scheduled releases of its main product. Your comments would make sense in that setting, since given the limited resources, it should stay focused in its products. But Linux is being promoted mainly by the people who use it, and who make the promotion on their free time, either on their blogs, forums, and mouth to mouth. So we can very well do both at the same time. It’s working. It doesn’t seem that way because we have a huge rock to move, which is MS and their 95% market share and their huge PR and marketing budget. But the crack in the armor has been made.
Y
yoyo (nice nick btw
)
I am not insinuating that businesses are the only ones promoting Linux. It is probably best that we have businesses promoting and making deals on the business end.
Also, when it comes to software, I am not saying that criticizing software is wrong, afterall, our competitors give us a lot to work with. Where I draw the line is where criticism is not on a software feature vs feature level… when it goes to protests (like the vista one I mentioned in my post) and when it goes to personal attacks on individuals — that’s where I draw the line. In my opinion, there’s nothing wrong with saying my software has better features than “x”. That’s just free enterprise competition.
Thanks for the comments folks!
“Where I draw the line is where criticism is not on a software feature vs feature level… when it goes to protests”
Ok , what s your opinion about DRM ?
My opinion on DRM is the same as software. Criticism is fine, but I still draw the line at radical activism. Protesting in the streets over DRM would be silly at best.