Posted by: jonreagan | June 28, 2007

Ubuntu Box Update

Now that the Ubuntu box has been in place for about three weeks now, I have notices that I did not post on its progress. As of last Sunday, 14 CDs have been taken. The current depletion rate is at an even seven CDs per week. It may not sound like many CDs, but that is 14 more people with Ubuntu.

Now, on to some more interesting stuff.

Linspire’s CEO has written another of his “Linspire Letters”, with the latest outlining his reaction - to the reactions of the Linspire vs. Microsoft. His reaction is somewhat predictable (We give choice, etc.). However, there is one paragraph that caught my eye, with a quote over to the side from within the paragraph:

“For Linux to be taken seriously by the mainstream distribution channels and enterprise customers, it needs to respect the IP of others. I’m quite sure Linspire has done more than just about any other Linux distributor to license patents, copyrights and trademarks so we can bring the best of open source and proprietary offerings to our customers. I believe this practice will mean something as Linux moves beyond the early adopters to mainstream channels. I want our users to have confidence when they use Linspire Linux, knowing that it has crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s, and is a fully legal and supported product. Microsoft is just one of the dozens of companies we have entered into agreements with to deliver on that promise.”

The key part is:

“For Linux to be taken seriously by the mainstream distribution channels and enterprise customers, it needs to respect the IP of others.”

Respect the IP. Where have we heard this before? Why, Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO, of coarse! Remember, right after the Novell/Microsoft announcement? We all know that Linux respects the IP of all companies. Is there a chance that some patents are crossed with Microsoft? Yes, there is - just as much as Microsoft violates Linux patents.

Here’s the link to the letter:

http://www.linspire.com/linspire_letter_archives.php?id=49

Responses

Ask yourself if you think companies in the US will distribute an OS bundled with illegal copies of proprietary codecs. They cannot without incurring that legal liability.

Of coarse in a lot of other countries this is not a legal concern, that fact that I can use the Ubuntu tools to download illegal copies of DVD, WMA, MP3, etc. will not sit well with companies that sell to the mainstream.

Linspire didn’t make those technologies proprietary, they just licensed them so that they could legally redistribute them. That’s no different than legally redistributing StarOffice or Transgaming software.

You hit the nail on the head.

It’s sad, really, that many software patents are unecessary. I am not fully against them… I think only the software that is TRULY unique should get a patent. Unfortunately today, patents are abused often. Even Microsoft crosses the line with patents now and then. That’s the hard battle for open source software, because we do not have all the commonly used resources to put into our code.

Respecting IP in software is important, and it is hard to cross them, since proprietary software’s code is closed, unless there is a direct copy by chance, much like SCO vs. (Enter favorite tech co. here) - which returns back to the abused patent system.

Baseless patent claims are what fueled Mr. Carmony’s comment, with respecting IP. It is like saying Linux does not respect IP, intentionally.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories