Posted by: jonreagan | June 15, 2007

PCLinuxOS and Fedora

In my usual “Linux hopping” travels from distro to distro, I sometimes stretch outside the Ubuntu family of distros. Recently, I have gone between PCLinuxOS to Fedora, and then back to Ubuntu. These are my notes from using both, and my comparison to Ubuntu 7.04.

My first distribution outside of the Ubuntu and Debian code base led me to PCLinuxOS. I have heard much about this system in Linux circles.

The installation of PCLinuxOS was a bit of a challenge. I first had to figure out how to partition the disk. As with all my installations, I always do a full install. At last, I found a “recommended settings” button, which automatically sets the partition settings, such as the / dir, and the other different directories. After this point, it was much easier to install. I believe th installation was based off Knoppix, which I have heard is not for novices.

Using PCLinuxOS

Using the OS was actually a pleasing experience, as it uses KDE, and Synaptic as a package manager. The applications are of the usual, and there are about 5,000 applications available through synaptic. This is the first system I have ever used with the RPM package system.

Otherwise, everything seemed rather familiar.

Next up, Fedora 7.

The second distro that I used recently is Fedora 7. The installation went rather well, however, downloading a 2.8 GB file on a base-level speed DSL connection is a major pain, taking well over a day.

Installation was easy, however confusing at the beginning with the “check CD” option. Otherwise, the installation is as every bit easy as Ubuntu’s.

Usage was much like Ubuntu. Many of my favorite applications were available. However, when I went to install more applications, (the package manager is accessed by the “add/remove” applications menu option) Apps are in groups of relevant type, with optional packages available. There is also a “list” tab, along with a “search” tab. With 5,000 packages available, there was obviously less than Ubuntu or Debian available, but there were many good apps nonetheless.

However, soon things began to take a turn for the worst. As I added and removed applications, I ran into the problem that made ESR leave Fedora - and it is not fun. The problem is the decencies are so tightly held, that when I removed the eclipse development program, open office went with it. That’s when I decided to call it quits and move back to Ubuntu.

In my opinion, both are easy to use, but the package management mixed with installation troubles both led me to believe that they still have a way to go before they can be labeled “average-joe friendly”. PCLinuxOS is still a new distro, and I beleive that they will begin to mature by the end of this year. Fedora will need to fix their package management system before they can really make it into the mainstream.

Responses

Some would argue that Fedora is already in the main stream. Maybe not for the average new user but no OS is really that friendly for a new user. Not even Windows. I do agree though that there package management system is at time flawed and some great Linux programs are not offered unless you go outside of the official repos. I personally use PCLinuxOS as it’s Linux but yet easy when I want it to be. That’s just personal preference though. I’m sure you personally prefer Ubuntu and that’s fine. We’re all Linux.

PCLinuxOS isn’t a new distro. It’s been around since 2003, even longer than Ubuntu my friend.

Agreed. Linux does have a way to go… It was really Fedora that had the package management issue - but I do like what they include with the system, and as I said, PCLinuxOS is a new(er) system, and it’s not bad. I like all of them, and yes, even though Ubuntu is my favorite distro, I can’t resist trying out all distributions… for example, I am using Linux Mint right now. :)

A few points to you Jon:

PCLinuxOS in not new, IT’S BEEN THERE SINCE 2003. How much time you had with PCLinuxOS? IT’S ALREADY MATURE, AND WON’T TAKE BY THE END OF THIS YEAR, IF YOU HAD SOME TIME WITH IT, YOU SHOULD KNOW IT’S PROBABLY MORE MATURE THAN UBUNTU.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories